[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200301131701.GA7487@ubuntu>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 14:17:01 +0100
From: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gabriela Bittencourt <gabrielabittencourt00@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Declare a few variables as __read_mostly
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 12:26:20PM +0100, Oscar Carter wrote:
> > These include module parameters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c
> > index 5e48b3ddb94c..701300202b21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c
> > @@ -49,12 +49,12 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DEVICE_FULL_DRV_NAM);
> >
> > #define RX_DESC_DEF0 64
> > -static int vnt_rx_buffers = RX_DESC_DEF0;
> > +static int __read_mostly vnt_rx_buffers = RX_DESC_DEF0;
> > module_param_named(rx_buffers, vnt_rx_buffers, int, 0644);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_buffers, "Number of receive usb rx buffers");
> >
> > #define TX_DESC_DEF0 64
> > -static int vnt_tx_buffers = TX_DESC_DEF0;
> > +static int __read_mostly vnt_tx_buffers = TX_DESC_DEF0;
> > module_param_named(tx_buffers, vnt_tx_buffers, int, 0644);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(tx_buffers, "Number of receive usb tx buffers");
> >
>
> Why? What does this help with?
If we declare these variables __read_mostly we can improve the performance. If
these variables are read many more times than written, each core of a multicore
system can maintain a copy in a local cache and the time to access is less than
if they use the shared-cache.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
thanks,
oscar carter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists