linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3624E93E7E8D8FF291051508F2E70@BYAPR11MB3624.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:57:04 +0000
From:   "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
        "dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Prestopine, Charles D" <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>,
        Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>,
        "Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make
 pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 4:54 AM
> To: Kammela, Gayatri <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Somayaji, Vishwanath <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>;
> dvhart@...radead.org; Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerberg@...el.com>;
> peterz@...radead.org; Prestopine, Charles D
> <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>; Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>;
> Box, David E <david.e.box@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make
> pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states
> 
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 12:44:26PM -0800, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
> > Currently pmc_core_lpm_display() uses array of struct pointers i.e.,
> > tgl_lpm_maps for Tiger Lake directly to iterate through and to get the
> > number of status/live status registers which is hardcoded and cannot
> > be re-used for future platforms that support sub-states. To maintain
> > readability, make pmc_core_lpm_display() generic, so that it can
> > re-used for future platforms.
> 
> My comments below.

Thanks Andy! for the comments.

> 
> ...
> 
> > +static int pmc_core_lpm_get_arr_size(const struct pmc_bit_map **maps)
> > +{
> > +	int idx, arr_size = 0;
> 
> And why do you need arr_size variable at all?

I could just return idx value at the end of the for loop. I will remove the arr_size variable.

> 
> > +
> > +	for (idx = 0; maps[idx]; idx++)
> > +		arr_size++;
> > +
> > +	return arr_size;
> > +}
> 
> ...
> 
> > -	int index, idx, len = 32, bit_mask;
> > +	int index, idx, bit_mask, len = 32;
> 
> What's the point of shuffling this?

Just wanted to have all uninitialized variables declared before initialized ones. I will just leave this out in v4.

> 
> > +	int arr_size = pmc_core_lpm_get_arr_size(maps);
> 
> This would be better in a split manner, i.e.
> 
> 	int arr_size;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	arr_size = ...;

Sure, I will make this change in v4

> 
> ...
> 
> > +	lpm_regs = kmalloc_array(arr_size, sizeof(*lpm_regs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if(!lpm_regs)
> 
> > +		goto err;
> 
> There is no point to have the label. Simple return will work.

Thought adding a label will help not to have multiple kfree() in the same function (one here at the check and one at the end of the for loop) I will add a return.

> 
> > -	for (index = 0; tgl_lpm_maps[index]; index++) {
> > +	for (index = 0; maps[index]; index++) {
> 
> Why not to reuse arr_size here?

Good point! I missed it. I will use the arr_size here to iterate.

> 
> >  		lpm_regs[index] = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
> >  		offset += 4;
> >  	}
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>