linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] init: main: add KUnit to kernel init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5de96ed-fb76-d322-fa40-c6e870e76c36@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:13:03 -0600
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, jdike@...toit.com,
        richard@....at, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, arnd@...db.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        alan.maguire@...cle.com, yzaikin@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sboyd@...nel.org, logang@...tatee.com,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] init: main: add KUnit to kernel init

On 2/27/20 7:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Remove KUnit from init calls entirely, instead call directly from
> kernel_init().
> 
> Co-developed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/kunit/test.h | 9 +++++++++
>  init/main.c          | 4 ++++
>  lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 +---
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 8a02f93a6b505..8689dd1459844 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,15 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name);
>  
>  int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
>  
> +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)

I suspected this would not work if a unittest was builtin but CONFIG_KUNIT
was set to module.

So I decided to experiment a bit to verify my assumptions (before applying
this patch series).  I tried to set CONFIG_KUNIT to module, then set
CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST to built in.  Kconfig does not let me do this
because KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST is inside a 'if KUNIT' in lib/kunit/Kconfig,
but instead switches KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST to a module, and warns that it
has done so.  This was a bit of a surprise, but seems reasonable.

So my next assumption is that the architecture of KUnit expects
each individual unit test config option to depend upon CONFIG_KUNIT.
If this is the case, please clearly document that requirement in
the KUnit documentation.


> +int kunit_run_all_tests(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
> +
>  /*
>   * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into
>   * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index ee4947af823f3..7875a5c486dc4 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include <trace/events/initcall.h>
>  
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
>  static int kernel_init(void *);
>  
>  extern void init_IRQ(void);
> @@ -1444,6 +1446,8 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
>  
>  	do_basic_setup();
>  
> +	kunit_run_all_tests();
> +
>  	console_on_rootfs();
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> index 6429927d598a5..b75a46c560847 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[];
>  
>  #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
>  
> -static int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> +int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
>  {
>  	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
>  	bool has_test_failed = false;
> @@ -31,6 +31,4 @@ static int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -late_initcall(kunit_run_all_tests);
> -
>  #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
>