[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302200027.GG11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 20:00:27 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
arnd@...db.de, keescook@...omium.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
alan.maguire@...cle.com, yzaikin@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
frowand.list@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, logang@...tatee.com, knut.omang@...cle.com,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] init: main: add KUnit to kernel init
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 03:08:09PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Remove KUnit from init calls entirely, instead call directly from
> kernel_init().
>
> Co-developed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
In particular the placement and strategy matches my expectations and
allows us to think of __init as a separate beast, as we should.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists