linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kthread: Fix WQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200302130517.075f97ee@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:05:17 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Cc:     <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <paulmck@...nel.org>, <tj@...nel.org>,
        <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kthread: Fix WQ_SYSFS workqueues path
 name

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:40:52 +0800
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com> wrote:

> The set of WQ_SYSFS workqueues should be displayed using
> "ls /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue", add the missing '/'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst
> index baeeba8762ae..21818aca4708 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ To reduce its OS jitter, do any of the following:
>  	Such a workqueue can be confined to a given subset of the
>  	CPUs using the ``/sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/*/cpumask`` sysfs
>  	files.	The set of WQ_SYSFS workqueues can be displayed using
> -	"ls sys/devices/virtual/workqueue".  That said, the workqueues
> +	"ls /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue".  That said, the workqueues
>  	maintainer would like to caution people against indiscriminately
>  	sprinkling WQ_SYSFS across all the workqueues.	The reason for
>  	caution is that it is easy to add WQ_SYSFS, but because sysfs is

Applied, thanks.

jon