[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g3c0rhW0eofG6FFMVNVPiw5fxP7LUpFJ2OYdLCAabZ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:26:45 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Badger <ebadger@...aio.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Add pgprot_t to mhp_params
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:55 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-02-29 3:44 p.m., Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:25 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> devm_memremap_pages() is currently used by the PCI P2PDMA code to create
> >> struct page mappings for IO memory. At present, these mappings are created
> >> with PAGE_KERNEL which implies setting the PAT bits to be WB. However, on
> >> x86, an mtrr register will typically override this and force the cache
> >> type to be UC-. In the case firmware doesn't set this register it is
> >> effectively WB and will typically result in a machine check exception
> >> when it's accessed.
> >>
> >> Other arches are not currently likely to function correctly seeing they
> >> don't have any MTRR registers to fall back on.
> >>
> >> To solve this, provide a way to specify the pgprot value explicitly to
> >> arch_add_memory().
> >>
> >> Of the arches that support MEMORY_HOTPLUG: x86_64, and arm64 need a simple
> >> change to pass the pgprot_t down to their respective functions which set
> >> up the page tables. For x86_32, set the page tables explicitly using
> >> _set_memory_prot() (seeing they are already mapped). For ia64, s390 and
> >> sh, reject anything but PAGE_KERNEL settings -- this should be fine,
> >> for now, seeing these architectures don't support ZONE_DEVICE.
> >>
> >> A check in __add_pages() is also added to ensure the pgprot parameter was
> >> set for all arches.
> >>
> >> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> >> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> >> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> >> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> >> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 3 ++-
> >> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> >> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 3 +++
> >> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 5 +++++
> >> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +-
> >> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 2 ++
> >> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++++-
> >> mm/memremap.c | 6 +++---
> >> 10 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> index ee37bca8aba8..ea3fa844a8a2 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> >> @@ -1058,7 +1058,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
> >>
> >> __create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, start, __phys_to_virt(start),
> >> - size, PAGE_KERNEL, __pgd_pgtable_alloc, flags);
> >> + size, params->pgprot, __pgd_pgtable_alloc,
> >> + flags);
> >>
> >> memblock_clear_nomap(start, size);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> >> index 97bbc23ea1e3..d637b4ea3147 100644
> >> --- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> >> +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> >> @@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, params);
> >> if (ret)
> >> printk("%s: Problem encountered in __add_pages() as ret=%d\n",
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> >> index 19b1da5d7eca..832412bc7fad 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> >> @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int __ref arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size());
> >>
> >> start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
> >> - rc = create_section_mapping(start, start + size, nid, PAGE_KERNEL);
> >> + rc = create_section_mapping(start, start + size, nid,
> >> + params->pgprot);
> >> if (rc) {
> >> pr_warn("Unable to create mapping for hot added memory 0x%llx..0x%llx: %d\n",
> >> start, start + size, rc);
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> >> index e9e4a7abd0cc..87b2d024e75a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> >> @@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->altmap))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> rc = vmem_add_mapping(start, size);
> >> if (rc)
> >> return rc;
> >> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> >> index e5114c053364..b9de2d4fa57e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> >> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> >> @@ -412,6 +412,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> /* We only have ZONE_NORMAL, so this is easy.. */
> >> ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, params);
> >> if (unlikely(ret))
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> >> index e25a4218e6ff..96d8e4fb1cc8 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> >> @@ -858,6 +858,11 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> >> {
> >> unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = _set_memory_prot(start, nr_pages, params->pgprot);
> >
> > Perhaps a comment since it's not immediately obvious where the
> > PAGE_KERNEL prot was established, and perhaps add a conditional to
> > skip this call in the param->pgprot == PAGE_KERNEL case?
>
> Yes I can add the skip in the PAGE_KERNEL case. Though I'm not sure what
> you are asking for with regards to the comment. Just that pgprot is set
> by the caller usually to PAGE_KERNEL?
No, I'm reacting to this comment in the changelog "For x86_32, set the
page tables explicitly using _set_memory_prot() (seeing they are
already mapped)". You've done some investigation that
x86_32::arch_add_memory() expects the page tables to be already
established. I think that's worth capturing inline in the code for
other people doing cross-arch arch_add_memory() changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists