linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 26/66] KVM: x86: Replace bare "unsigned" with "unsigned int" in cpuid helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200302235709.27467-27-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date:   Mon,  2 Mar 2020 15:56:29 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 26/66] KVM: x86: Replace bare "unsigned" with "unsigned int" in cpuid helpers

Replace "unsigned" with "unsigned int" to make checkpatch and people
everywhere a little bit happier, and to avoid propagating the filth when
future patches add more cpuid helpers that work with unsigned (ints).

No functional change intended.

Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
index 72a79bdfed6b..46b4b61b6cf8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
  * and can't be used by KVM to query/control guest capabilities.  And obviously
  * the leaf being queried must have an entry in the lookup table.
  */
-static __always_inline void reverse_cpuid_check(unsigned x86_leaf)
+static __always_inline void reverse_cpuid_check(unsigned int x86_leaf)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf == CPUID_LNX_1);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf == CPUID_LNX_2);
@@ -87,15 +87,16 @@ static __always_inline u32 __feature_bit(int x86_feature)
 
 #define feature_bit(name)  __feature_bit(X86_FEATURE_##name)
 
-static __always_inline struct cpuid_reg x86_feature_cpuid(unsigned x86_feature)
+static __always_inline struct cpuid_reg x86_feature_cpuid(unsigned int x86_feature)
 {
-	unsigned x86_leaf = x86_feature / 32;
+	unsigned int x86_leaf = x86_feature / 32;
 
 	reverse_cpuid_check(x86_leaf);
 	return reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf];
 }
 
-static __always_inline u32 *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_feature)
+static __always_inline u32 *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+						     unsigned int x86_feature)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
 	const struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(x86_feature);
@@ -119,7 +120,8 @@ static __always_inline u32 *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsi
 	}
 }
 
-static __always_inline bool guest_cpuid_has(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_feature)
+static __always_inline bool guest_cpuid_has(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					    unsigned int x86_feature)
 {
 	u32 *reg;
 
@@ -130,7 +132,8 @@ static __always_inline bool guest_cpuid_has(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_
 	return *reg & __feature_bit(x86_feature);
 }
 
-static __always_inline void guest_cpuid_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_feature)
+static __always_inline void guest_cpuid_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					      unsigned int x86_feature)
 {
 	u32 *reg;
 
-- 
2.24.1