linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead of CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5ecab57-cc38-762c-ae06-fed0433e0246@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:54:34 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "amit.kucheria@...durent.com" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead of
 CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On 02/03/2020 09:26, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Uwe
> 
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead
>> of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:50:10PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
>>> Use __maybe_unused for power management related functions instead of
>>> #if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>>
>> IMHO translating my "otherwise looks fine" in a "Reviewed-by" is a bit bold.
>> Please don't assume this.
> 
> OK, will keep it in mind next time, thanks.

When applying a patch, now we add the link to the lkml archive
automatically. I can't apply this patch if the Reviewed-by is not accepted.

Or the Reviewed-by tag is confirmed or a V3 without the Reviewed-by must
be resent.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog