linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead of CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:01:31 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        "amit.kucheria@...durent.com" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead of
 CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/03/2020 09:26, Anson Huang wrote:
> > Hi, Uwe
> > 
> > 
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead
> >> of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:50:10PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> >>> Use __maybe_unused for power management related functions instead of
> >>> #if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to simplify the code.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> >>
> >> IMHO translating my "otherwise looks fine" in a "Reviewed-by" is a bit bold.
> >> Please don't assume this.
> > 
> > OK, will keep it in mind next time, thanks.
> 
> When applying a patch, now we add the link to the lkml archive
> automatically. I can't apply this patch if the Reviewed-by is not accepted.
> 
> Or the Reviewed-by tag is confirmed or a V3 without the Reviewed-by must
> be resent.

I didn't look close enough to justify a Reviewed-by:, so "the
Reviewed-by tag is confirmed" is ruled out.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |