| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:04:09 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 3/4] mailbox: imx: add SCU MU support
Hi Oleksij,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] mailbox: imx: add SCU MU support
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26.02.20 05:40, peng.fan@....com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > i.MX8/8X SCU MU is dedicated for communication between SCU and
> > Cortex-A cores from hardware design, and could not be reused for other
> purpose.
> >
> > Per i.MX8/8X Reference mannual, Chapter "12.9.2.3.2 Messaging
> Examples",
> > Passing short messages: Transmit register(s) can be used to pass
> > short messages from one to four words in length. For example, when
> > a four-word message is desired, only one of the registers needs to
> > have its corresponding interrupt enable bit set at the receiver side;
> > the message’s first three words are written to the registers whose
> > interrupt is masked, and the fourth word is written to the other
> > register (which triggers an interrupt at the receiver side).
> >
> > i.MX8/8X SCU firmware IPC is an implementation of passing short
> > messages. But current imx-mailbox driver only support one word
> > message, i.MX8/8X linux side firmware has to request four TX and four
> > RX to support IPC to SCU firmware. This is low efficent and more
> > interrupts triggered compared with one TX and one RX.
> >
> > To make SCU MU work,
> > - parse the size of msg.
> > - Only enable TR0/RR0 interrupt for transmit/receive message.
> > - For TX/RX, only support one TX channel and one RX channel
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >
> > V3:
> > Added scu type tx/rx and SCU MU type
> >
> > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 65
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index 901a3431fdb5..41664a64c5fd
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > @@ -38,11 +39,17 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> >
> > enum imx_mu_type {
> > IMX_MU_TYPE_GENERIC,
> > + IMX_MU_TYPE_SCU,
> > };
> >
> > struct imx_mu_priv;
> > struct imx_mu_con_priv;
> >
> > +struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max {
> > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> > + u32 data[7];
> > +} __packed __aligned(4);;
> > +
> > struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > enum imx_mu_type type;
> > int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp,
> > void *data); @@ -141,6 +148,48 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct
> imx_mu_priv *priv,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> > + struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max *msg = data;
> > + u32 *arg = data;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + switch (cp->type) {
> > + case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
>
> please add sanity check if msg->hdr.size can be handled by this driver version.
Yes, I forgot to add that. Should as below:
if (msg->hdr.size > sizeof(struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max))
return -EINVAL;
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++,
> > + priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
> > + }
> > + imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Send data on wrong channel
> type: %d\n", cp->type);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> > + struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp)
> > +{
> > + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max msg;
> > + u32 *data = (u32 *)&msg;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
> > + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
>
> please add sanity check. the message size should not be higher then
> sizeof(msg)
Yes.
>
> > + for (i = 1; i < msg.hdr.size; i++)
> > + *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
> > +
> > + imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
>
> Please do not forget to handle properly new msg size in your rx_callback. In
> previous implementation the message size was 4byte.
My patch could handle size larger than 4 words. The previous implementation
to limit 4 words is not good.
>
> > + mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&msg);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void imx_mu_txdb_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> > {
> > struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = (struct imx_mu_con_priv *)data; @@
> > -274,6 +323,7 @@ static struct mbox_chan * imx_mu_xlate(struct
> mbox_controller *mbox,
> > const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> > {
> > u32 type, idx, chan;
> > + struct imx_mu_priv *priv = to_imx_mu_priv(mbox);
> >
> > if (sp->args_count != 2) {
> > dev_err(mbox->dev, "Invalid argument count %d\n",
> sp->args_count);
> > @@ -284,7 +334,9 @@ static struct mbox_chan * imx_mu_xlate(struct
> mbox_controller *mbox,
> > idx = sp->args[1]; /* index */
> > chan = type * 4 + idx;
> >
> > - if (chan >= mbox->num_chans) {
> > + if (chan >= mbox->num_chans ||
> > + (priv->dcfg->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_SCU &&
> > + type < IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB && idx > 0)) {
>
> We need this check since mbox->num_chans do not reflects new reality. Now
> we have only 2 channels. One RX and one TX. No idea if we need doorbell
> channels for SCU. If doorbells are not supported, it is better to add a separate
> imx_mu_xlate for SCU
TXDB currently not supported, but I am not sure whether it will be supported
in future. I could add a separate xlate as you suggested, since TXDB not support
now.
>
> and add SCU specific channel init in probe in addition to:
> for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_CHANS; i++) {
>
> struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = &priv->con_priv[i];
>
>
>
> cp->idx = i % 4;
>
> cp->type = i >> 2;
>
> cp->chan = &priv->mbox_chans[i];
>
> priv->mbox_chans[i].con_priv = cp;
>
> snprintf(cp->irq_desc, sizeof(cp->irq_desc),
>
> "imx_mu_chan[%i-%i]", cp->type, cp->idx);
>
> }
>
> There is no need to init unsupported channels. Please pack it in separate
> function
ok. I just want to reuse current code as more as possible and avoid
adding too much new code.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> > dev_err(mbox->dev, "Not supported channel number: %d.
> (type: %d, idx: %d)\n", chan, type, idx);
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
> > @@ -401,9 +453,20 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg
> imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> > .xCR = 0x64,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
> > + .type = IMX_MU_TYPE_SCU,
> > + .tx = imx_mu_scu_tx,
> > + .rx = imx_mu_scu_rx,
> > + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> > + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> > + .xSR = 0x20,
> > + .xCR = 0x24,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8-mu-scu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> >
>
> Kind regards,
> Oleksij Rempel
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. |
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> engutronix.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C47558a
> c6c6bd4ba38c2708d7be8eb946%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%
> 7C0%7C0%7C637187392512520476&sdata=N0WbBREAFegjX0p%2FSv3
> cuLpb8FvnCePU%2Bz6VkhC%2FU4c%3D&reserved=0 |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:
> +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists