[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <240472.1583144994@turing-police>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:29:54 -0500
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Tetsuhiro Kohada <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
Cc: Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp,
motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: exfat: clean up d_entry rebuilding.
On Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:57:15 +0900, Tetsuhiro Kohada said:
> Clean up d_entry rebuilding in exfat_rename_file() and move_file().
>
> -Replace memcpy of d_entry with structure copy.
Those look OK.
> -Change to use the value already stored in fid.
> - if (exfat_get_entry_type(epnew) == TYPE_FILE) {
> + if (fid->type == TYPE_FILE) {
Are you sure this is OK to do? exfat_get_entry_type() does a lot of
mapping between values, using a file_dentry_t->type, while
fid->type is a file_id_t->type. and at first read it's not obvious to me whether
fid->type is guaranteed to have the correct value already.
(The abundant use of 0xNN constants in exfat_get_entry_type() doesn't
inspire confidence that it's looking at what you think it's looking at...)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists