lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <240472.1583144994@turing-police>
Date:   Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:29:54 -0500
From:   "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To:     Tetsuhiro Kohada <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
Cc:     Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp,
        motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: exfat: clean up d_entry rebuilding.

On Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:57:15 +0900, Tetsuhiro Kohada said:
> Clean up d_entry rebuilding in exfat_rename_file() and move_file().
>
> -Replace memcpy of d_entry with structure copy.

Those look OK.

> -Change to use the value already stored in fid.

> -		if (exfat_get_entry_type(epnew) == TYPE_FILE) {

> +		if (fid->type == TYPE_FILE) {

Are you sure this is OK to do? exfat_get_entry_type() does a lot of
mapping between values, using a file_dentry_t->type, while
fid->type is a file_id_t->type. and at first read it's not obvious to me whether
fid->type is guaranteed to have the correct value already.

(The abundant use of 0xNN constants in exfat_get_entry_type()  doesn't
inspire confidence that it's looking at what you think it's looking at...)



Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ