[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9a7c18b-c8a2-f566-b8a0-198551f60827@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:35:27 +0100
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: stm32: add STM32MP1-based Linux Automation
MC-1 board
Hi,
On 3/2/20 11:29 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> On 3/2/20 11:18 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> On Mo, 2020-03-02 at 11:06 +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +&gpu {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>
>> This question is more to the ST guys than this specific DT: Why is the
>> GPU marked as disabled in the SoC dtsi file? This device is always
>> present on the SoC and AFAICS there are no board level dependencies, so
>> there is no reason to have it disabled by default, right? Removing the
>> status property from the dtsi would remove the need for this override
>> on the board DT.
>
> You are right. With new stm32 device tree diversity, it makes no longer sens to disable GPU node in stm32mp157 dtsi file. Indeed, we use now dedicated files for each SoC (stm32mp151 / stm32mp153 /stm32mp157).
>
> Ahmad, can you add this modification in your series please ?
Will preprend it to v2.
Cheers,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists