linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] media: staging: tegra-vde: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:04:20 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] media: staging: tegra-vde: Use
 devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()

02.03.2020 11:04, Dan Carpenter пишет:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 09:09:15PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> This helps to make code cleaner a tad.
> 
> Please don't start the commit message in the middle of a sentence.

Could you please clarify what do you mean by the "middle of a sentence"?
The commit's message doesn't sound "middle" to me at all.

> It looks like this for some of us:
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-driver-devel&m=158282701430176&w=2

This link points to this patch, I don't quite understand what you're
trying to convey here.

> I generally read the subject or the full commit message but seldom
> both.

The commit's title describes the change briefly, while the message gives
a rational for the change. Usually reviewer should consult the code
changes themselves for more details.

Do you have some kind of a email filter that shows only the commit's
message? Otherwise I'm not sure what's the problem.

> Otherwise the patch looks very good.

Thanks