| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <830c49f7-74b4-c6c3-7883-ec0f967ec730@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:13:18 +0300
From: Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: i2c: imx219: Add support for SRGGB8_1X8 format
Hi Lad,
Thanks for the patch!
On 28.02.2020 19:55, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> imx219 sensor is capable for RAW8/RAW10 modes, this commit adds support
> for SRGGB8_1X8 format.
... but not for SGRBG8_1X8, SGBRG8_1X8, and SBGGR8_1X8?
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> index 8b48e148f2d0..1388c9bc00bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
>
> #define IMX219_REG_ORIENTATION 0x0172
>
> +#define IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7 0x018c
> +#define IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15 0x018d
> +
> /* Test Pattern Control */
> #define IMX219_REG_TEST_PATTERN 0x0600
> #define IMX219_TEST_PATTERN_DISABLE 0
> @@ -135,6 +138,16 @@ struct imx219_mode {
> struct imx219_reg_list reg_list;
> };
>
> +struct imx219_pixfmt {
> + u32 code;
> + u32 colorspace;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx219_pixfmt imx219_formats[] = {
> + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB, },
> + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB },
> +};
This table has only one (RGGB) layout (out of 4 possible) for 8-bit and for 10-bit
modes.
> +
> /*
> * Register sets lifted off the i2C interface from the Raspberry Pi firmware
> * driver.
> @@ -168,8 +181,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_3280x2464_regs[] = {
> {0x0171, 0x01},
> {0x0174, 0x00},
> {0x0175, 0x00},
> - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> {0x0301, 0x05},
> {0x0303, 0x01},
> {0x0304, 0x03},
> @@ -230,8 +241,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_1920_1080_regs[] = {
> {0x0171, 0x01},
> {0x0174, 0x00},
> {0x0175, 0x00},
> - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> {0x0301, 0x05},
> {0x0303, 0x01},
> {0x0304, 0x03},
> @@ -290,8 +299,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_1640_1232_regs[] = {
> {0x0171, 0x01},
> {0x0174, 0x01},
> {0x0175, 0x01},
> - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> {0x0301, 0x05},
> {0x0303, 0x01},
> {0x0304, 0x03},
> @@ -413,6 +420,8 @@ struct imx219 {
> struct v4l2_subdev sd;
> struct media_pad pad;
>
> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt fmt;
> +
- adding the whole struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt for "is it RAW10 or RAW8" looks
like an overkill (and adds some duplication of code - see below).
> struct clk *xclk; /* system clock to IMX219 */
> u32 xclk_freq;
>
> @@ -519,19 +528,26 @@ static int imx219_write_regs(struct imx219 *imx219,
> }
>
> /* Get bayer order based on flip setting. */
> -static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219)
> +static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, u32 code)
Naming the 2nd argument as 'code' seems a bit confusing to me, as it
used to select between MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*_1X10 and MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*_1X8.
While the Bayer order depends on the current hflip/vflip settings
(they are stored in struct imx219).
> {
> - /*
> - * Only one bayer order is supported.
> - * It depends on the flip settings.
> - */
> - static const u32 codes[2][2] = {
> + static const u32 codes10[2][2] = {
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10, },
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10, },
> };
> + static const u32 codes8[2][2] = {
> + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8, },
> + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8, },
> + };
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&imx219->mutex);
> - return codes[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> +
> + if (code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10 ||
> + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10 ||
> + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10 ||
> + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10)
> + return codes10[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> +
> + return codes8[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> }
Wouldn't extending the original table be a better and simpler solution?
Something like:
static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, int is_8_bit)
{
static const u32 codes[2][2][2] = {
{
{ MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10, },
{ MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10, },
},
{
{ MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8, },
{ MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8, },
},
};
lockdep_assert_held(&imx219->mutex);
return codes[is_8bit][imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
}
"is_8bit" a member of struct imx219 which equals to 0 if the sensor if RAW10 mode,
and is 1 for RAW8 mode.
>
> static int imx219_open(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh)
> @@ -539,13 +555,26 @@ static int imx219_open(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh)
> struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *try_fmt =
> v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, fh->pad, 0);
> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *fmt;
>
> mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
>
> + fmt = &imx219->fmt;
> + fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8;
> + fmt->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
> + fmt->ycbcr_enc = V4L2_MAP_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT(fmt->colorspace);
> + fmt->quantization = V4L2_MAP_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT(true,
> + fmt->colorspace,
> + fmt->ycbcr_enc);
> + fmt->xfer_func = V4L2_MAP_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT(fmt->colorspace);
> + fmt->width = supported_modes[0].width;
> + fmt->height = supported_modes[0].height;
> + fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> +
> /* Initialize try_fmt */
> try_fmt->width = supported_modes[0].width;
> try_fmt->height = supported_modes[0].height;
> - try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> + try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, fmt->code);
> try_fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
>
> mutex_unlock(&imx219->mutex);
> @@ -646,16 +675,12 @@ static int imx219_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> {
> - struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> -
> - /*
> - * Only one bayer order is supported (though it depends on the flip
> - * settings)
> - */
Guess the above comment still holds
> - if (code->index > 0)
Though two media bus formats will be available: 8-bit and 10-bit ones, both
with the same Bayer order.
> + if (code->pad != 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> + code->code = imx219_formats[code->index].code;
This excludes all the Bayer orders except RGGB thus breaking the hflip/vflip support, right?
I would better check (as the sensor can only support two media bus formats at a time):
if (code->index > 1)
return -EINVAL;
and use imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, int is_8_bit) to set the code->code:
code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, code->index);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -669,7 +694,7 @@ static int imx219_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> if (fse->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (fse->code != imx219_get_format_code(imx219))
> + if (fse->code != imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219->fmt.code))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> fse->min_width = supported_modes[fse->index].width;
Looking at the "[PATCH 3/3] media: i2c: imx219: Add support 640x480",
the RAW8 mode is added to the end of the supported_modes[] array after the three RAW10 modes.
Guess this breaks VIDIOC_SUBDEV_ENUM_FRAME_SIZE ioctl for RAW8, as in the RAW8 case
it would return 0 (and the supported frame sizes) for fse->index=3 only, while for all
the other values, fse->index=0 included, it will return -EINVAL ...
> @@ -696,7 +721,7 @@ static void imx219_update_pad_format(struct imx219 *imx219,
> {
> fmt->format.width = mode->width;
> fmt->format.height = mode->height;
> - fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> + fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219->fmt.code);
> fmt->format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
>
> imx219_reset_colorspace(&fmt->format);
> @@ -710,7 +735,7 @@ static int __imx219_get_pad_format(struct imx219 *imx219,
> struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *try_fmt =
> v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(&imx219->sd, cfg, fmt->pad);
> /* update the code which could change due to vflip or hflip: */
> - try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> + try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, try_fmt->code);
> fmt->format = *try_fmt;
> } else {
> imx219_update_pad_format(imx219, imx219->mode, fmt);
> @@ -741,11 +766,19 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> const struct imx219_mode *mode;
> struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *framefmt;
> int exposure_max, exposure_def, hblank;
> + int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats); i++)
> + if (imx219_formats[i].code == fmt->format.code)
This excludes all the Bayer orders except RGGB thus breaking the hflip/vflip support, right?
> + break;
> + if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats))
> + i = 0;
> +
> /* Bayer order varies with flips */
> - fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> + fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219,
> + imx219_formats[i].code);
>
> mode = v4l2_find_nearest_size(supported_modes,
> ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes),
> @@ -756,6 +789,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> framefmt = v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, cfg, fmt->pad);
> *framefmt = fmt->format;
> } else if (imx219->mode != mode) {
> + imx219->fmt = fmt->format;
> imx219->mode = mode;
> /* Update limits and set FPS to default */
> __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->vblank, IMX219_VBLANK_MIN,
> @@ -786,6 +820,36 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int imx219_set_framefmt(struct imx219 *imx219)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (imx219->fmt.code) {
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8:
> + ret = imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7,
> + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x08);
> + ret |= imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15,
> + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x08);
> + break;
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10:
> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10:
> + ret = imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7,
> + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x0a);
> + ret |= imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15,
> + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x0a);
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int imx219_start_streaming(struct imx219 *imx219)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&imx219->sd);
> @@ -800,6 +864,12 @@ static int imx219_start_streaming(struct imx219 *imx219)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = imx219_set_framefmt(imx219);
I just wonder if it makes sense to remove setting IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A register
from the struct imx219_reg mode_x_y_regs[] tables and to introduce new imx219_set_framefmt()
function which is called right after the settings from the mode_x_y_regs[] are written
into the sensor, and is never called otherwise?
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s failed to set format\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* Apply customized values from user */
> ret = __v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(imx219->sd.ctrl_handler);
> if (ret)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists