[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302041933.uuoa5kbvgtde37oq@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:49:33 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Add support for OPP_PLUS
On 28-02-20, 16:45, Tero Kristo wrote:
> From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
>
> DRA762 SoC introduces OPP_PLUS which runs at 1.8GHz. Add
> support for this OPP in ti-cpufreq driver.
>
> Acked-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index 557cb513bf7f..d62b6b21325a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -25,11 +25,14 @@
>
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP 11
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP 15
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_PLUS_MPU_OPP 18
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP 23
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP 24
>
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_NOM_MPU_OPP BIT(0)
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP BIT(1)
> #define DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP BIT(2)
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_PLUS_MPU_OPP BIT(3)
>
> #define OMAP3_CONTROL_DEVICE_STATUS 0x4800244C
> #define OMAP3_CONTROL_IDCODE 0x4830A204
> @@ -80,6 +83,9 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
> */
>
> switch (efuse) {
> + case DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_PLUS_MPU_OPP:
> + case DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
> + calculated_efuse |= DRA76_EFUSE_PLUS_MPU_OPP;
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
> case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP:
> calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
This is already merged, why sending it again ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists