[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f8a9519-c1ab-8d46-18c4-4e0f9d53e3ff@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:21:27 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, aik@...abs.ru,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com, jgg@...pe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tpm: ibmvtpm: Add support for TPM 2
On 3/2/20 6:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:03:30PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Support TPM 2 in the IBM vTPM driver. The hypervisor tells us what
>> version of TPM is connected through the vio_device_id.
> I'd prefer "TPM2" over "TPM 2".
Fixed.
>
>> In case a TPM 2 is found, we set the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 flag
>> and get the command codes attributes table. The driver does
>> not need the timeouts and durations, though.
> A TPM2 what? TPM2 is not a thing.
I don't know what you mean? Is it the word 'found' and it should be
'present' ? Otherwise a TPM2 is a 'thing' / object / device, at least to me.
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists