linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 06/66] KVM: x86: Move CPUID 0xD.1 handling out of the index>0 loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  2 Mar 2020 15:56:09 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/66] KVM: x86: Move CPUID 0xD.1 handling out of the index>0 loop

Mov the sub-leaf 1 handling for CPUID 0xD out of the index>0 loop so
that the loop only handles index>2.  Sub-leafs 2+ have identical
semantics, whereas sub-leaf 1 is effectively a feature sub-leaf.

Moving sub-leaf 1 out of the loop does duplicate a bit of code, but
the nent/maxnent code will be consolidated in a future patch, and
duplicating the clear of ECX/EDX is arguably a good thing as the reasons
for clearing said registers are completely different.

No functional change intended.

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index e5cf1e0cf84a..fc8540596386 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -653,26 +653,33 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 		if (!supported)
 			break;
 
-		for (idx = 1, i = 1; idx < 64; ++idx) {
+		if (*nent >= maxnent)
+			goto out;
+
+		do_host_cpuid(&entry[1], function, 1);
+		++*nent;
+
+		entry[1].eax &= kvm_cpuid_D_1_eax_x86_features;
+		cpuid_mask(&entry[1].eax, CPUID_D_1_EAX);
+		if (entry[1].eax & (F(XSAVES)|F(XSAVEC)))
+			entry[1].ebx = xstate_required_size(supported, true);
+		else
+			entry[1].ebx = 0;
+		/* Saving XSS controlled state via XSAVES isn't supported. */
+		entry[1].ecx = 0;
+		entry[1].edx = 0;
+
+		for (idx = 2, i = 2; idx < 64; ++idx) {
 			u64 mask = ((u64)1 << idx);
+
 			if (*nent >= maxnent)
 				goto out;
 
 			do_host_cpuid(&entry[i], function, idx);
-			if (idx == 1) {
-				entry[i].eax &= kvm_cpuid_D_1_eax_x86_features;
-				cpuid_mask(&entry[i].eax, CPUID_D_1_EAX);
-				entry[i].ebx = 0;
-				if (entry[i].eax & (F(XSAVES)|F(XSAVEC)))
-					entry[i].ebx =
-						xstate_required_size(supported,
-								     true);
-			} else {
-				if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
-					continue;
-				if (WARN_ON_ONCE(entry[i].ecx & 1))
-					continue;
-			}
+			if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
+				continue;
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(entry[i].ecx & 1))
+				continue;
 			entry[i].ecx = 0;
 			entry[i].edx = 0;
 			++*nent;
-- 
2.24.1