lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 06:57:46 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: x86: Dynamically allocate per-vCPU
 emulation context

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:26:21AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/02/20 18:29, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>  struct x86_emulate_ctxt {
> >> +	void *vcpu;
> > Why 'void *'? I changed this to 'struct kvm_vcpu *' and it seems to
> > compile just fine...
> > 
> 
> I guess because it's really just an opaque pointer; using void* ensures
> that the emulator doesn't break the emulator ops abstraction.

Ya, it prevents the emulator from directly deferencing the vcpu.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ