linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 07/66] KVM: x86: Check for CPUID 0xD.N support before validating array size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  2 Mar 2020 15:56:10 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/66] KVM: x86: Check for CPUID 0xD.N support before validating array size

Now that sub-leaf 1 is handled separately, verify the next sub-leaf is
needed before rejecting KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID due to an insufficiently
sized userspace array.

Note, although this is technically a bug, it's not visible to userspace
as KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID is guaranteed to fail on KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE,
which is hardcoded to be added after leaf 0xD.  The real motivation for
the change is to tightly couple the nent/maxnent and do_host_cpuid()
sequences in preparation for future cleanup.

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index fc8540596386..fd9b29aa7abc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -670,13 +670,14 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 		entry[1].edx = 0;
 
 		for (idx = 2, i = 2; idx < 64; ++idx) {
-			u64 mask = ((u64)1 << idx);
+			if (!(supported & BIT_ULL(idx)))
+				continue;
 
 			if (*nent >= maxnent)
 				goto out;
 
 			do_host_cpuid(&entry[i], function, idx);
-			if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
+			if (entry[i].eax == 0)
 				continue;
 			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(entry[i].ecx & 1))
 				continue;
-- 
2.24.1