[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:18 -0800
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 48/66] KVM: x86: Remove stateful CPUID handling
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 3:57 PM Sean Christopherson
<sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index b5dce17c070f..49527dbcc90c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -495,25 +495,16 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
> * time, with the least-significant byte in EAX enumerating the
> * number of times software should do CPUID(2, 0).
> *
> - * Modern CPUs (quite likely every CPU KVM has *ever* run on)
> - * are less idiotic. Intel's SDM states that EAX & 0xff "will
> - * always return 01H. Software should ignore this value and not
> + * Modern CPUs, i.e. every CPU KVM has *ever* run on are less
Nit: missing comma after "run on."
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists