lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:02:31 +0100 (CET)
From:   Clément Leger <cleger@...rayinc.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-remoteproc <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>, s-anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] remoteproc: Rename rproc_elf_sanity_check for
 elf32

Hi Bjorn, 

----- On 3 Mar, 2020, at 00:13, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.andersson@...aro.org wrote:

> On Mon 02 Mar 01:38 PST 2020, Clement Leger wrote:
> 
>> Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64,
>> rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format
>> at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect
>> when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only
>> elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check).
>> 
> 
> Is there a reason for preventing ELF64 binaries be loaded?

I decided to go this way to let driver maintainer decide if they want
to support elf64 to avoid problems with 64bits addresses/sizes which do
not fit in their native type (size_t for instance). This is probably
not going to happen and there are additionnal checks before calling
rproc_da_to_va. And addresses should be filtered by rproc_da_to_va.
So, actually it seems there is no reason to forbid supporting elf32/64
for all drivers.

Regards,

Clément

> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@...ray.eu>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c       | 2 +-
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 6 +++---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h   | 2 +-
>>  drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c         | 2 +-
>>  drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c         | 2 +-
>>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c           | 2 +-
>>  6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index 4bfaf4a3c4a3..99f0b796fbc7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char
>> *name,
>>  		rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments;
>>  		rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table;
>>  		rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table;
>> -		rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check;
>> +		rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check;
>>  		rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr;
>>  	}
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
>> index c2a9783cfb9a..5a67745f2638 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
>> @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@
>>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>>  
>>  /**
>> - * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF firmware image
>> + * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF32 firmware image
>>   * @rproc: the remote processor handle
>>   * @fw: the ELF firmware image
>>   *
>>   * Make sure this fw image is sane.
>>   */
>> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>  {
>>  	const char *name = rproc->firmware;
>>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct
>> firmware *fw)
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf32_sanity_check);
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * rproc_elf_get_boot_addr() - Get rproc's boot address.
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> index 0deae5f237b8..28639c588d58 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len);
>>  phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
>>  int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
>>  
>> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>>  u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>>  int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>>  int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
>> index a3268d95a50e..a6cbfa452764 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
>>  	.parse_fw		= st_rproc_parse_fw,
>>  	.load			= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>>  	.find_loaded_rsc_table	= rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>> -	.sanity_check		= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> +	.sanity_check		= rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
>>  	.get_boot_addr		= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> index 09bcb4d8b9e0..3cca8b65a8db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = {
>>  	.da_to_va       = slim_rproc_da_to_va,
>>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>>  	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>> -	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> +	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
>>  };
>>  
>>  /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> index a18f88044111..9a8b5f5e2572 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
>>  	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>>  	.parse_fw	= stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
>>  	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>> -	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> +	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf32_sanity_check,
>>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>>  };
>>  
>> --
>> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ