| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:27:04 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>, "Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: dma_mask limited to 32-bits with OF platform device
Robin, Christoph,
On 26/02/2020 13:33, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19/02/2020 17:25, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 19/02/2020 2:29 pm, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On 18/02/2020 19:22, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:28 AM Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Chrishtoph,
>>>>>
>>>>> The branch works fine for SATA on DRA7 with CONFIG_LPAE once I
>>>>> have the below DT fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you intend to send these fixes to -stable?
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------- arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi -------------------------
>>>>> index d78b684e7fca..853ecf3cfb37 100644
>>>>> @@ -645,6 +645,8 @@
>>>>> sata: sata@...41100 {
>>>>> compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci";
>>>>> reg = <0x4a140000 0x1100>, <0x4a141100 0x7>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>> + dma-ranges = <0x00000000 0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
>>>>
>>>> dma-ranges should be in the parent (bus) node, not the device node.
>>>
>>> I didn't understand why.
>>>
>>> There are many devices on the parent bus node and all devices might not have the 32-bit DMA limit
>>> the SATA controller has.
>>>
>>> SATA controller is the bus master and the ATA devices are children of the SATA controller.
>>
>> But SATA is not a memory-mapped bus - in the context of MMIO, the AHCI is the bus-master device, not a bridge or level of interconnect. The DeviceTree spec[1] clearly defines dma-ranges as an address translation between a "parent bus" and a "child bus".
>>
>> If in the worst case this address-limited interconnect really only exists between the AHCI's master interface and everything else in the system, then you'll have to describe it explicitly to meet DT's expectation of a "bus" (e.g. [2]). Yes, it's a bit clunky, but any scheme has its edge cases.
>>
>>> From Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt
>>>
>>> * DMA Bus master
>>> Optional property:
>>> - dma-ranges: <prop-encoded-array> encoded as arbitrary number of triplets of
>>> (child-bus-address, parent-bus-address, length). Each triplet specified
>>> describes a contiguous DMA address range.
>>> The dma-ranges property is used to describe the direct memory access (DMA)
>>> structure of a memory-mapped bus whose device tree parent can be accessed
>>> from DMA operations originating from the bus. It provides a means of
>>> defining a mapping or translation between the physical address space of
>>> the bus and the physical address space of the parent of the bus.
>>> (for more information see the Devicetree Specification)
>>>
>>> * DMA Bus child
>>> Optional property:
>>> - dma-ranges: <empty> value. if present - It means that DMA addresses
>>> translation has to be enabled for this device.
>>
>> Disregarding that this was apparently never in ePAPR, so not grandfathered in to DTSpec, and effectively nobody ever has actually followed it (oh, if only...), note "<empty>" - that still doesn't imply that a *non-empty* dma-ranges would be valid on device nodes.
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>> [1] https://www.devicetree.org/specifications/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181010120737.30300-20-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com/
>
> With the patch (in the end). dev->bus_dma_limit is still set to 0 and so is not being used.
>
> from of_dma_configure()
> ret = of_dma_get_range(np, &dma_addr, &paddr, &size);
> ...
> /* ...but only set bus limit if we found valid dma-ranges earlier */
> if (!ret)
> dev->bus_dma_limit = end;
>
> There is no other place bus_dma_limit is set. Looks like every device should inherit that
> from it's parent right?
Any ideas how to expect this to work?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> index 64a0f90f5b52..5418c31d4da7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> @@ -680,15 +680,22 @@
> };
>
> /* OCP2SCP3 */
> - sata: sata@...41100 {
> - compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci";
> - reg = <0x4a140000 0x1100>, <0x4a141100 0x7>;
> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> - phys = <&sata_phy>;
> - phy-names = "sata-phy";
> - clocks = <&l3init_clkctrl DRA7_L3INIT_SATA_CLKCTRL 8>;
> - ti,hwmods = "sata";
> - ports-implemented = <0x1>;
> + sata_aux_bus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x4a140000 0x0 0x1200>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1 0x00000000>;
> + sata: sata@...41100 {
> + compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci";
> + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1100>, <0x0 0x1100 0x0 0x7>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + phys = <&sata_phy>;
> + phy-names = "sata-phy";
> + clocks = <&l3init_clkctrl DRA7_L3INIT_SATA_CLKCTRL 8>;
> + ti,hwmods = "sata";
> + ports-implemented = <0x1>;
> + };
> };
>
> /* OCP2SCP1 */
>
--
cheers,
-roger
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists