[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:18:47 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/omap: Prepare DSS for probing without legacy
platform data
On 24/02/2020 21:12, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> In order to probe display subsystem (DSS) components with ti-sysc
> interconnect target module without legacy platform data and using
> devicetree, we need to update dss probing a bit.
>
> In the device tree, we will be defining the data also for the interconnect
> target modules as DSS really is a private interconnect. There is some
> information about that in 4460 TRM in "Figure 10-3. DSS Integration" for
> example where it mentions "32-bit interconnect (SLX)".
>
> The changes we need to make are:
>
> 1. Parse also device tree subnodes for the compatible property fixup
>
> 2. Update the component code to consider device tree subnodes
>
> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> ---
>
> This is needed for dropping DSS platform data that I'll be posting
> seprately. If this looks OK, can you guys please test and ack?
>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
> .../gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/omapdss-boot-init.c | 25 +++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
This doesn't conflict with drm-next (with Laurent's recent patches), so it should be fine for you to
have this in your branch.
And not a biggie, but I wonder if the changes to these two files should be in separate patches, due
to omapdss-boot-init going away. Well, probably doesn't matter.
Tomi
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists