linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:22:55 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing

On Tue 2020-03-03 16:24:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/02/27 14:01), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> > The discussion about hashing NULL pointer value[1] uncovered that
> > the basic tests of pointer formatting do not follow the original
> > structure and cause confusion.
> 
> FWIW, overall looks good to me.

Could I add Acked-by or Reviewed-by tag, please?

Best Regards,
Petr