linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Huge page-table entries for TTM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:53 +0100
From:   Thomas Hellström (VMware) 
        <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, pv-drivers@...are.com,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Huge page-table entries for TTM

On 3/1/20 5:04 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:08:04 +0100 Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@...pmail.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering what's the best way here to get the patches touching mm
>> reviewed and accepted?
>> While drm people and VMware internal people have looked at them, I think
>> the huge_fault() fallback splitting and the introduction of
>> vma_is_special_huge() needs looking at more thoroughly.
>>
>> Apart from that, if possible, I think the best way to merge this series
>> is also through a DRM tree.
> Patches 1-3 look OK to me.  I just had a few commenting/changelogging
> niggles.

Thanks for reviewing, Andrew.

I just updated the series following your comments.

Thanks,

Thomas