lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:05:22 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
        Houlong Wei <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        HS Liao <hs.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] dt-binding: gce: add gce header file for mt6779

On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:58:33 +0800, Dennis YC Hsieh wrote:
> Add documentation for the mt6779 gce.
> 
> Add gce header file defined the gce hardware event,
> subsys number and constant for mt6779.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt   |   8 +-
>  include/dt-bindings/gce/mt6779-gce.h          | 222 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/gce/mt6779-gce.h
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ