linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust to filesystem doc ReST conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200304140110.1951004f@lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:01:10 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust to filesystem doc ReST conversion

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:50:39 +0100 (CET)
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:

> > Thanks for fixing these, but ... what tree did you generate the patch
> > against?  I doesn't come close to applying to docs-next.
> >  
> 
> My patch was based on next-20200303, probably too much noise on 
> MAINTAINERS, such that it does not apply cleanly on docs-next.
> If you want, I can send a patch that fits to docs-next. Anyway, merging 
> will be similarly difficult later :(

Merge conflicts in MAINTAINERS are almost always trivial to resolve -
Stephen won't mind :)

Thanks,

jon