linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/pat: Handle no-GBPAGES case correctly in populate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8sTuj+Wkk8g2tv+1k9LczXV4yV4KSbaJ6Bs69SQwR2_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:51:01 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/pat: Handle no-GBPAGES case correctly in populate_pud

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 20:54, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 08:22:36PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The wrong one, obviously :-)
> >
> > With Haswell, I get [before]
> >
> > [    0.368541] 0x0000000000900000-0x0000000000a00000           1M
> > RW                     NX pte
> > [    0.369118] 0x0000000000a00000-0x0000000080000000        2038M
> > RW         PSE         NX pmd
> > [    0.369592] 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000b9800000         920M
> >                          pmd
> > [    0.370177] 0x00000000b9800000-0x00000000b9856000         344K
> >                          pte
> ^^ so this is showing the region that didn't get mapped, so you did
> reproduce the issue.
> > [    0.370649] 0x00000000b9856000-0x00000000b9a00000        1704K
> > RW                     NX pte
> > [    0.371066] 0x00000000b9a00000-0x00000000baa00000          16M
> > ro         PSE         x  pmd
> >
> > and after
> >
> > [    0.349577] 0x0000000000a00000-0x0000000080000000        2038M
> > RW         PSE         NX pmd
> > [    0.350049] 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000b9800000         920M
> >                          pmd
> > [    0.350514] 0x00000000b9800000-0x00000000b9856000         344K
> >                          pte
> ^^ but it didn't get fixed :( This region should now be mapped properly
> with flags RW/NX.
> > [    0.351013] 0x00000000b9856000-0x00000000b9a00000        1704K
> > RW                     NX pte
> >
> > so i'm still doing something wrong, I think?
>
> You're *sure* the after is actually after? There seems to be no change
> at all, the patch should have had some effect.

Duh.

Yes, you are right. It was 'operator error'