linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] xtensa: replace setup_irq() by request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMo8BfLxQ_zmTSPS1En7BxCXORKh3wBK2KnKoUBDFVgOufuEGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:41:53 -0800
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To:     afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
Cc:     "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)" 
        <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xtensa: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:41 PM afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com> wrote:
>
> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
> occur after memory allocators are ready.
>
> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
> ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
>
> Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos
>
> Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
> ---
> Hi Max Filippov,
>
> i believe you are the maintainer of xtensa, if you are okay w/ this change,
> please consider taking it thr' your tree, else please let me know.

Sure. Applied to my xtensa tree.

--
Thanks.
-- Max