[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200304224002.GA511869@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:40:02 -0500
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/pat: Handle no-GBPAGES case correctly in
populate_pud
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:51:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 20:54, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > You're *sure* the after is actually after? There seems to be no change
> > at all, the patch should have had some effect.
>
> Duh.
>
> Yes, you are right. It was 'operator error'
Phew! Thanks for the test :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists