[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200304084419.GA5831@local-michael-cet-test.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:44:20 +0800
From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] KVM: VMX: Define CET VMCS fields and #CP flag
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 01:42:54PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:11:28AM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > @@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr2,
> > * In future, applicable XSS state bits can be added here
> > * to make them available to KVM and guest.
> > */
> > -#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS 0
> > +#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER \
> > + | XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL)
>
> My preference would be to put the operator on the previous line, though I
> realize this diverges from other KVM behavior. I find it much easier to
> read With the names aligned.
>
> #define KVM_SUPPORTED_XSS (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER | \
> XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL)
Yep, I also feel it's preferable now :-), thanks!
> >
> > extern u64 host_xcr0;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists