[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1583312132-20932-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:55:32 +0100
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
To: <broonie@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>
CC: <alexandre.torgue@...com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<fabrice.gasnier@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: stm32-vrefbuf: fix a possible overshoot when re-enabling
There maybe an overshoot, when disabling, then re-enabling vrefbuf
too quickly. VREFBUF is used by ADC/DAC on some boards. When re-enabling
too quickly, an overshoot on the reference voltage make the conversions
inaccurate for a short period of time.
- Don't put the VREFBUF in HiZ when disabling, to force an active
discharge.
- Enforce a 1ms OFF/ON delay
Fixes: 0cdbf481e927 ("regulator: Add support for stm32-vrefbuf")
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
---
drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c b/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c
index bdfaf7e..992bc18 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/stm32-vrefbuf.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int stm32_vrefbuf_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
}
val = readl_relaxed(priv->base + STM32_VREFBUF_CSR);
- val = (val & ~STM32_ENVR) | STM32_HIZ;
+ val &= ~STM32_ENVR;
writel_relaxed(val, priv->base + STM32_VREFBUF_CSR);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(priv->dev);
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static const struct regulator_desc stm32_vrefbuf_regu = {
.volt_table = stm32_vrefbuf_voltages,
.n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_vrefbuf_voltages),
.ops = &stm32_vrefbuf_volt_ops,
+ .off_on_delay = 1000,
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists