[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200304123259.32199-1-mbenes@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:32:59 +0100
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/unwind/orc: Do not skip the first frame unless explicitly asked for
ORC unwinder can currently skip the first frame even if a user does not
ask for it. If both regs and first_frame parameters of unwind_start()
are set to NULL, state->sp and first_frame are later initialized to the
same value for an inactive task. Given there is "less than or equal to"
comparison used at the end of __unwind_start() for skipping stack frames,
the first frame is always skipped in this case.
Drop the equal part of the comparison and make it equivalent to the
frame pointer unwinder.
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
---
arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
index e9cc182aa97e..8452518cc20a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
/* Otherwise, skip ahead to the user-specified starting frame: */
while (!unwind_done(state) &&
(!on_stack(&state->stack_info, first_frame, sizeof(long)) ||
- state->sp <= (unsigned long)first_frame))
+ state->sp < (unsigned long)first_frame))
unwind_next_frame(state);
return;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists