linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 07/18] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add a gpio-usb-connector example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:57:56 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jackp@...eaurora.org, balbi@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/18] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add a
 gpio-usb-connector example

On Tue,  3 Mar 2020 17:11:48 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> A USB connector should be a child node of the USB controller
> connector/usb-connector.txt. This patch adds an example of how to do this
> to the dwc3 binding descriptions.
> 
> It is necessary to declare a connector as a child-node of a USB controller
> for role-switching to work, so this example should be helpful to others
> implementing that.
> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.