[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200304151145.GB9984@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:11:45 +0100
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: JIT helpers for fmod_ret progs
On 03-Mär 20:52, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> >
> > * Split the invoke_bpf program to prepare for special handling of
> > fmod_ret programs introduced in a subsequent patch.
> > * Move the definition of emit_cond_near_jump and emit_nops as they are
> > needed for fmod_ret.
> > * Refactor branch target alignment into its own function
> > align16_branch_target.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> > ---
>
> I trust invoke_bpf_prog logic didn't change, code was just moved around, right?
Yes, that's correct.
- KP
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
>
>
> > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists