| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:45:52 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: jolsa@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com, alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com,
vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com, pavel.gerasimov@...el.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack
Em Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:49:02AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:30:00AM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com escreveu:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> > The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can
> > be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX
> > branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it.
> > However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and
> > entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be
> > wrong, since the output format is different with new struct branch_stack.
> > Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to indicate whether the
> > hw_idx is output.
> > Add get_branch_entry() to return corresponding pointer of entries[0].
> This should be broken up in at least two patches, one that syncs
> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h with the kernel, and another to do
> what this changeset log message states, I'll do it this time to expedite
> processing of this patchset, please do it that way next time.
So, after doing that split I'm also suggesting/tentatively applying this
patch on top of it, to keep the naming convention we have in tools/perf,
and also the 'static' to that inline, please holler if you disagree,
I'll put the end result in a branch for further visualization/comments.
At some point these functions obtaining stuff from a 'struct perf_sample' to
tools/lib/perf/ (aka libperf), so better go doing proper namespacing,
etc, right Jiri?
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index acf3107bbda2..656b347f6dd8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
struct addr_location alf, alt;
u64 i, from, to;
int printed = 0;
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstacksym(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
struct addr_location alf, alt;
u64 i, from, to;
int printed = 0;
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
struct addr_location alf, alt;
u64 i, from, to;
int printed = 0;
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct machine *machine, FILE *fp)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
u64 start, end;
int i, insn, len, nr, ilen, printed = 0;
struct perf_insn x;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.h b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
index 014c3cd4cb32..154a05cd03af 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/branch.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct branch_stack {
* Check whether the hw_idx is available,
* and return the corresponding pointer of entries[0].
*/
-inline struct branch_entry *get_branch_entry(struct perf_sample *sample)
+static inline struct branch_entry *perf_sample__branch_entries(struct perf_sample *sample)
{
u64 *entry = (u64 *)sample->branch_stack;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index 808ca27bd5cf..e74a5acf66d9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@ void hist__account_cycles(struct branch_stack *bs, struct addr_location *al,
u64 *total_cycles)
{
struct branch_info *bi;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
/* If we have branch cycles always annotate them. */
if (bs && bs->nr && entries[0].flags.cycles) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index b0623f99fb9c..fd14f1489802 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ struct branch_info *sample__resolve_bstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
{
unsigned int i;
const struct branch_stack *bs = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
struct branch_info *bi = calloc(bs->nr, sizeof(struct branch_info));
if (!bi)
@@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
/* LBR only affects the user callchain */
if (i != chain_nr) {
struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr, j, k;
bool branch;
struct branch_flags *flags;
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
int max_stack)
{
struct branch_stack *branch = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
int chain_nr = 0;
u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
index 02b6c87c5abe..8c1b27cd8b99 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static PyObject *python_process_brstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct thread *thread)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
PyObject *pylist;
u64 i;
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static PyObject *python_process_brstacksym(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct thread *thread)
{
struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
PyObject *pylist;
u64 i;
char bf[512];
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index dab985e3f136..055b00abd56d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void callchain__lbr_callstack_printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
{
struct ip_callchain *callchain = sample->callchain;
struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
u64 kernel_callchain_nr = callchain->nr;
unsigned int i;
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static void callchain__printf(struct evsel *evsel,
static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample *sample, bool callstack)
{
- struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
+ struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
uint64_t i;
printf("%s: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists