[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo50=Wt9LFWDjkJa99T8r8A64JWgfqApmir8kX=kSXd1yog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:07:55 +0000
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: context: Clean up documentation
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 08:11, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com> wrote:
>
> Fix kernel doc comments to avoid warnings when compiling with W=1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
Since we're talking about legacy, aka user mode-setting code, I think
a wiser solution is to simply remove the documentation. It is _not_
something we should encourage people to read, let alone use.
Nit: prefix should be "drm:"
-Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists