linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 07/18] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add a gpio-usb-connector example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:24:17 +0000
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jackp@...eaurora.org, balbi@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/18] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add a gpio-usb-connector
 example

On 04/03/2020 14:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Mar 2020 17:11:48 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> A USB connector should be a child node of the USB controller
>> connector/usb-connector.txt. This patch adds an example of how to do this
>> to the dwc3 binding descriptions.
>>
>> It is necessary to declare a connector as a child-node of a USB controller
>> for role-switching to work, so this example should be helpful to others
>> implementing that.
>>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

Yep apologies I forgot to add your

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

when posting this one