lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:25:41 +0000
From:   "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
CC:     "tbird20d@...il.com" <tbird20d@...il.com>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scripts/sphinx-pre-install: add '-p python3' to
 virtualenv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> 
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:07:48 +0000
> "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com> wrote:
> 
> > The less fragile approach would have been to just
> > always add the '-p python3' option to the virtualenv setup hint,
> > but Mauro seemed to want something more fine-tuned.
> 
> At some point I think we'll want to say that Python 2 just isn't supported
> anymore.  After all, the language itself isn't supported anymore.  Perhaps
> it's time to add a warning somewhere.

Probably.  IMHO always adding the 'p python3' would have been the
first vestiges of such a hint, but maybe it should be more explicit.
A more explicit statement of "watch out if your default python
interpreter is python2" would have probably shortened some of 
my setup time.

Ubuntu 16.04 and Ubuntu 18.04 both include python3, but have
/usr/bin/python default to python2.  So, while the package recommendations
from the script were good (and sufficient), the virtualenv hint was somewhat
lacking.

And, just for full disclosure, I wish there was a way to mark this type of fix
with a obsolescence  flag so it could be removed later.  This is the type of
thing that gets put into a script as a workaround for a transition period, but
keeps being run 10 years later when it's no longer relevant.  Heck, the whole
virtualenv recommendation might be irrelevant in the next version of Ubuntu
(but maybe the script already figures that out.)
 -- Tim


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ