[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e65d3cd4-9339-4586-7aff-07652cb1ae47@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:36:07 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: vpillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, pjt@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>, aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Core scheduling v5
On 3/4/20 8:59 AM, vpillai wrote:
>
> ISSUES
> ------
> - Aaron(Intel) found an issue with load balancing when the tasks have
Just to set the record straight, Aaron works at Alibaba.
> different weights(nice or cgroup shares). Task weight is not considered
> in coresched aware load balancing and causes those higher weights task
> to starve.
Thanks.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists