[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32047314-c91e-0405-bcfe-43d515128231@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:19:32 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration
documentation
On 3/5/20 11:06 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> Which of the possibly unanswered issues do you find not concrete enough so far?
>>>>
>>>> e.g.:
>>>>>>> Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges?
>>>
>>> Do you expect that known open issues need to be repeated for each patch revision?
>>
>> Ideally not, but not very much is ideal.
>
> Did you notice any aspects where I would be still looking for more helpful answers?
Sorry, I haven't been tracking all of the email Q&A/response/replies
all that carefully.
>
>> IOW, it is sometimes required (if one cares enough; sometimes
>> one just gives up).
>
> I find this communication detail unfortunate occasionally.
Sure. I do too.
>
>>> How do you think about the desired tracking of bug reports
>>> also for this software?
> …
>> Masami seems to be responsive.
>
> The involved contributors show different response delays, don't they?
That's always the case, in any of the Linux subsystems that I have
been involved with.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists