lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:58:56 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: add missing @0 to memory nodenames

Hi Johan, Rob,

Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2020, 23:21:52 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Goal was to reduce the error output of existing code a little bit,
> so that we can use it for the review of new patches.
> Some questions:
> As I don't have the hardware, where else is coreboot used?
> Is this a rk3288-veyron.dtsi problem only?
> ie. Is it a option to produce a patch serie v2 without veyron?
> Can someone help testing?

I believe that is more question for @Rob :

In the past we said that it would be ok to have "memory" nodes without
address, so "memory {}" instead of "memory@0 {}", simply because
bootloaders mess up sometimes.

Question now would be how to make the yaml bindings happy.

Thanks
Heiko


> 
> Johan
> 
> On 3/5/20 10:31 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Johan,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 4. März 2020, 08:40:50 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> >> A test with the command below gives for example this error:
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-tinker.dt.yaml: /: memory:
> >> False schema does not allow
> >> {'device_type': ['memory'], 'reg': [[0, 0, 0, 2147483648]]}
> >>
> >> The memory nodes all have a reg property that requires '@' in
> >> the nodename. Fix this error by adding the missing '@0' to
> >> the involved memory nodenames.
> >>
> >> make ARCH=arm dtbs_check
> >> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=~/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dtschema/
> >> schemas/root-node.yaml
> >
> > changes to memory nodes you sadly cannot do in such an automated fashion.
> > If you read the comment in rk3288-veyron.dtsi you'll see that a previous
> > similar iteration broke all of those machines as their coreboot doesn't
> > copy with memory@0 and would insert another memory node without @0
> >
> > In the past iteration the consensus then was that memory without @0
> > is also ok (as it isn't changeable anyway).
> >
> 
> > As I don't really want to repeat that, I'd like actual hardware tests
> > before touching memory nodes.
> 
> Any suggestion/feedback rapport welcome.
> 
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> >
> 




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ