[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200305081135.yg7wryd3hrqzocrm@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:11:35 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, tglx@...utronix.de, swood@...hat.com,
williams@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: RCU use of swait
On 2020-03-04 16:35:26 [-0800], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
Hi Paul,
> Or is there some other reason why {S,}RCU needs to use swait that I
> am forgetting?
swait can be used in hardirq-context (on RT) that is in a section within
local_irq_save() / raw_spin_lock() and so.
wait on the hand uses spinlock_t which can not be used in this context.
So if you have no users which fall into that category then you could
move back to wait.h.
> Thanx, Paul
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists