lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <978293b9-8e9f-55f6-6ec4-e2d66c4db0de@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 20:44:24 +0800
From:   Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Is this code chunk in init_apic_mappings() superfluous?

Hi,

I am trying to figure the following code chunk out:

	if (x2apic_mode) {
		boot_cpu_physical_apicid = read_apic_id();
		return;
	}

As my understanding, even in x2APIC mode, boot_cpu_physical_apicid is
also got via early_acpi_process_madt --> ... --> register_lapic_address,
so, is it for any corner case I am not aware?
-- 
Sincerely,
Cao jin


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ