linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/12] spi: Do spi_take_timestamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200305131634.GD4046@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:16:34 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Esben Haabendal <eha@...f.com>, angelo@...am.it,
        andrew.smirnov@...il.com,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Wei Chen <weic@...dia.com>, Mohamed Hosny <mhosny@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] spi: Do spi_take_timestamp_pre for as many times
 as necessary

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 15:04, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > That's mostly all true but it's still better to pull fixes like this (or
> > the patch limiting the size) forwards and not have to think if it's safe
> > to not apply them as a fix, it's less effort all round.

> So do you want me to do something about it now?

No, it's fine for now but please bear this in mind in future.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)