[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200305153623.GA11500@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:36:23 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: VMX: rename 'kvm_area' to 'vmxon_region'
Super nit: can I convince you to use "KVM: VMX:" instead of "KVM: x86: VMX:"?
$ glo | grep -e "KVM: x86: nVMX" -e "KVM: x86: VMX:" | wc -l
8
$ glo | grep -e "KVM: nVMX" -e "KVM: VMX:" | wc -l
1032
I'm very conditioned to scan for "KVM: *VMX:", e.g. I was about to complain
that this used the wrong scope :-) And in the event that Intel adds a new
technology I'd like to be able to use "KVM: Intel:" and "KVM: ***X:"
instead of "KVM: x86: Intel:" and "KVM: x86: Intel: ***X:" for code that is
common to Intel versus specific to a technology.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:01:22AM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> The name 'kvm_area' is misleading (as we have way too many areas which are
> KVM related), what alloc_kvm_area()/free_kvm_area() functions really do is
> allocate/free VMXON region for all CPUs. Rename accordingly.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
+1000
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists