[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200305155115.GC11500@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:51:15 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
DavidWang@...oxin.com, CooperYan@...oxin.com,
QiyuanWang@...oxin.com, HerryYang@...oxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] x86/Kconfig: modify X86_UMIP depends on CPUs
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:49:09PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> CONFIG_X86_UMIP is generic since commit b971880fe79f (x86/Kconfig:
> Rename UMIP config parameter).
>
> Some Centaur family 7 CPUs and Zhaoxin family 7 CPUs support the UMIP
> feature. So, modify X86_UMIP to cover these CPUs too.
That leaves UMC_32, TRANSMETA_32 and CYRIX_32 as the last CPU_SUP types
that don't support UMIP. Maybe it's time to remove the CPU_SUP checks
altogether, same as X86_SMAP?
> Tony W Wang-oc (2):
> x86/Kconfig: Make X86_UMIP to cover Centaur CPUs
> x86/Kconfig: Make X86_UMIP to cover Zhaoxin CPUs
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists