linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: imx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkzPROdphvmtpZ6YiajZ2dYLrojC-rGYkq4jK2yzTnAJ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:16:51 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-remoteproc <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: dummy kick method

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 07:25, Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com> wrote:
>
> add kick method that does nothing, to avoid errors in rproc_virtio_notify.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 3e72b6f38d4b..796b6b86550a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -240,9 +240,15 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>         return va;
>  }
>
> +static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> +{
> +
> +}
> +

If rproc::kick() is empty, how does the MCU know there is packets to
fetch in the virtio queues?

>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>         .start          = imx_rproc_start,
>         .stop           = imx_rproc_stop,
> +       .kick           = imx_rproc_kick,
>         .da_to_va       = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
>  };
>
> --
> 2.24.1
>