linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: watchdog: Touch kernel watchdog in sched code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:11:23 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: watchdog: Touch kernel watchdog in sched code

On Wed,  4 Mar 2020 13:39:41 -0800
Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com> wrote:

> The main purpose of kernel watchdog is to test whether scheduler can
> still schedule tasks on a cpu. In order to reduce latency from
> periodically invoking watchdog reset in thread context, we can simply
> touch watchdog from pick_next_task in scheduler. Compared to actually
> resetting watchdog from cpu stop / migration threads, we lose coverage
> on: a migration thread actually get picked and we actually context
> switch to the migration thread. Both steps are heavily protected by
> kernel locks and unlikely to silently fail. Thus the change would
> provide the same level of protection with less overhead.

Have any measurements showing the drop in overhead?

> 
> The new way vs the old way to touch the watchdogs is configurable
> from:
> 
> /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_touch_in_thread_interval
> 
> The value means:
> 0: Always touch watchdog from pick_next_task
> 1: Always touch watchdog from migration thread
> N (N>0): Touch watchdog from migration thread once in every N
>          invocations, and touch watchdog from pick_next_task for
>          other invocations.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sysctl.c     | 11 ++++++++++-
>  kernel/watchdog.c   | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1a9983da4408..9d8e00760d1c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3898,6 +3898,27 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt)
>  	schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sched_count);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, sched_should_touch_watchdog);
> +
> +void touch_watchdog_from_sched(void);
> +
> +/* Helper called by watchdog code */
> +void resched_for_watchdog(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> +
> +	this_cpu_write(sched_should_touch_watchdog, true);

Perhaps we should have a preempt_disable, otherwise it is possible
to get preempted here.

-- Steve

> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
> +	/* Trigger resched for code in pick_next_task to touch watchdog */
> +	resched_curr(rq);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +