[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaxB-xTTDcshttGnVMgDLm96CC8FYsQT4LpobvCWSQym2=8qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:19:56 -0800
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 542/542] pipe: use exclusive waits when
reading or writing
Hello Linus,
After this change, one more criu test became flaky. This is due to one
of corner cases, so I am not sure that we need to fix something in the
kernel. I have fixed this issue in the test. I am not sure that this
will affect any real applications.
Here is the reproducer:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char buf[1<<20];
int pid, p[2], ret;
if (pipe(p) < 0)
return 1;
pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) {
close(p[1]);
ret = read(p[0], buf, sizeof(buf));
if (ret < 0)
return 1;
printf("read -> %d\n", ret);
return 0;
}
close(p[0]);
ret = write(p[1], buf, sizeof(buf));
if (ret < 0)
return 1;
printf("write -> %d\n", ret);
return 0;
}
Before this change:
[avagin@...top fifo]$ uname -a
Linux laptop 5.3.7-200.fc30.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 18 20:13:59 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[avagin@...top fifo]$ strace -e read,write,pipe -f ./pipe_bigbuf
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\260r\2\0\0\0\0\0"...,
832) = 832
read(3, "\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
784) = 784
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\5\0\0\0GNU\0\2\0\0\300\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
32) = 32
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\24\0\0\0\3\0\0\0GNU\0gZ\316<\240z\v\206=\360\37F\32{\t\204"...,
68) = 68
read(3, "\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
784) = 784
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\5\0\0\0GNU\0\2\0\0\300\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
32) = 32
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\24\0\0\0\3\0\0\0GNU\0gZ\316<\240z\v\206=\360\37F\32{\t\204"...,
68) = 68
pipe([3, 4]) = 0
strace: Process 622350 attached
[pid 622349] write(4,
"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
1048576 <unfinished ...>
[pid 622350] read(3, <unfinished ...>
[pid 622349] <... write resumed> ) = 1048576
[pid 622350] <... read resumed>
"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
1048576) = 1048576
[pid 622349] write(1, "write -> 1048576\n", 17write -> 1048576
) = 17
[pid 622350] write(1, "read -> 1048576\n", 16read -> 1048576
) = 16
[pid 622349] +++ exited with 0 +++
+++ exited with 0 +++
After this change:
[root@...4 ~]# strace -e read,write,pipe -f ./pipe_bigbuf
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\260r\2\0\0\0\0\0"...,
832) = 832
read(3, "\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
784) = 784
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\5\0\0\0GNU\0\2\0\0\300\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
32) = 32
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\24\0\0\0\3\0\0\0GNU\0L\355\265_\4c\17r@ix\305q\26W\242"...,
68) = 68
read(3, "\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
784) = 784
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\5\0\0\0GNU\0\2\0\0\300\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
32) = 32
read(3, "\4\0\0\0\24\0\0\0\3\0\0\0GNU\0L\355\265_\4c\17r@ix\305q\26W\242"...,
68) = 68
pipe([3, 4]) = 0
strace: Process 4946 attached
[pid 4945] write(4,
"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
1048576 <unfinished ...>
[pid 4946] read(3,
"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
1048576) = 65536
[pid 4946] write(1, "read -> 65536\n", 14read -> 65536
) = 14
[pid 4945] <... write resumed>) = 131072
[pid 4946] +++ exited with 0 +++
--- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=4945, si_uid=0} ---
+++ killed by SIGPIPE +++
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 3:03 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:33 PM Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > I run CRIU tests on the kernel with both these patches. Everything work
> > as expected.
>
> Thanks. I've added your tested-by and pushed out the fix.
>
> Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists